Assuming Battlefield still wants to revisit other pivotal points in history, there is one time period the franchise touched on very briefly. Returning to Vietnam would be perfect for the Battlefield franchise because the combat during the Vietnam War emphasizes what the series has done best. Plus, a vignette-style campaign like in Battlefield 1 but set during the Vietnam War could be incredibly interesting, and considering the many diverse perspectives the player could view the war through would provide a very compelling story. Chaotic firefights in jungles, lush and varied scenery, and paired with destruction Battlefield is known for, a Vietnam time period would evoke serious Bad Company 2 vi
Speaking of which, one of Battlefield: Bad Company 2 ‘s final expansions was also based in Vietnam , so the potential is there. There also was a Battlefield Vietnam released in 2004, so there’s a few sources in Battlefield ‘s history that DICE could use as a jumping off point for a new iterat
There’s a few options for which setting Battlefield could go next, but the most likely setting is a modern day conflict. A few leaks and rumors on the internet have come out regarding Battlefield 6 , all of which seem to agree the shooter is returning to a contemporary time period. For a series that’s done both historical time periods as well as modern war settings, there’s definitely positive and negative points for a modern setting if true. Battlefield needs a fresh start, and even though the series started with WWII, a modern setting may be the perfect rest
That being said, modern combat spawned some of the greatest Battlefield games to date. Battlefield 4 , despite its troublesome launch issues, shaped up to be a great Battlefield game overtime thanks to content updates. Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2 were some of the best shooters the franchise had to offer because there was a clear focus on what each game intended to do. Bad Company 2 has some of the most intelligent map design in the entire series, justifying the at-the-time revolutionary destruction physics. Battlefield 3 thrived in its variety, showcasing traditional Battlefield gameplay on huge maps like Caspian Border, but also adding more close-quarters combat in maps like Operation Mé
Only problem with taking the adventurous route with Battlefield is that the game could potentially dip into risky territory. Conflicts that simply are lesser known, not as long-lasting, or even uninteresting from a gameplay perspective could make developing these games that much less feasible. It’s very unlikely Battlefield 6 would select anything that’s pre-20th century that isn’t WW2 or the Vietnam War, but there is the tiniest chance that a spin-off title or mainline entry could explore a conflict not often seen in ga
The highly-anticipated Battlefield 6 _ has been confirmed to be coming to the next generation of consoles when it launches next year, and more details are on their way shortly. _Battlefield, from developer DICE and publisher EA, is a long-running first-person shooter series that focuses on large-scale battles, combining infantry with vehicular combat. After announcing last month that support for the latest game in the franchise, Battlefield 5 , would be ending , EA confirmed that its sequel would release next year , echoing their earlier claims that a new Battlefield wouldn’t be releasing until 2021 . A few days later, it was clarified that the new game would be coming to next-gen consoles, the PlayStation 5 and the Xbox Serie
Battlefield 5 , the most recent release in the Battlefield franchise, is ending support this June, with Battlefield 2042 beginner Guide|https://battlefield2042hq.com/ 6 confirmed to be on the way. Both Call of Duty and Battlefield have recently revisited World War 2 as a return to each franchise’s roots. Now it seems Call of Duty ‘s annual releases are shifting back to modern and futuristic battlefields. Either EA’s first-person shooter will follow suit, or the franchise could once again carve its own p
One of the defining aspects of Battlefield since the beginning has always been destruction. The mechanics have iterated and changed over the years, but in more recent titles in the franchise, destruction seems to have unintentionally become less important. Games like Bad Company and Battlefield 3 used to employ destruction in a functionally relevant manner, making the mechanic an integral part of the environment design. Playing Rush in Bad Company 2 generally meant blowing holes into M-COM stations to breach and set a charge, or even take the whole building down if that’s more via
Regardless of which franchise is borrowing from which, Battlefield will need to find a way to differentiate itself from Modern Warfare regardless. It’s less about the classic Call of Duty vs. Battlefield debate , but more so the fact that Ground War follows a lot of the conventions of classic Battlefield multiplayer without the trappings of destruction or variety of vehicles. The solution isn’t necessarily to change things up significantly, considering innovation is probably at the bottom of Battlefield ‘s list at the moment. Battlefield has its world-changing destruction mechanics, massive map design, and variety of land and air vehicles to emphasize controlled chaos. As integral parts of the gameplay loop, Battlefield should double-down or focus on these aspects that make the shooter uni